Member Market Reports

Free CNBC Reports
Search


Advanced Search
Article Options
 »  Home  »  Free CNBC Reports 2006  »  October 2006  »  October 30 2006 CNBC Report


October 30 2006 CNBC Report
By Bill McLaren | Published  12/20/2004 | October 2006 | Unrated
October 30 2006 CNBC Report

mclarenreport.com.au

CNBC EUROPE

˜

LET?S LOOK AT THE FTSE 100 DAILY CHART

˜

˜

Last week we looked at the weekly chart that had a vibration in time that could have produce a significant amount of resistance to the up trend for last week.˜ Last week I indicated most stock indexes around the world were in a position to exhaust into highs.˜ Most notably in the US and European Indexes. The FTSE did not have an exhaustion style of trend so we needed to rely upon the daily price action to give a clue whether this index can break away from the April/May highs.˜ Thursday showed an exhaustion day and Friday showed another wide range down proving Thursday was an exhaustion of some sort but the move down didn?t break any support.˜ But now there is an exhaustion spike up and that becomes very helpful to a technical analysis.˜ If the index cannot get above that spike high this week it will put the trend at risk as it would make a lower high possible.˜ The time window to bring in a lower high would likely be 4 days.˜ If the rally exceeds 4 days it will exceed the time of a normal counter tend and thus put a lower high in doubt-still possible but not within the normal time window.˜˜ The only risk I can see at this time is a move back to the September highs.˜ This index has a history of distributing for a few weeks before changing trend.˜ The top to the left had side of this chart took 4 weeks to form.˜ We should be able to look for a lower high from this pattern IF it is going to trend down.

˜

LET?S LOOK AT THE S&P 500 INDEX

˜

˜

Last week we were looking for evidence of an exhaustion of this trend.˜ The time period had run out but due to the nature of the ?PATTERN OF TRENDING? there still needed to be that move up that was a little more vertical and a few more days up than the previous recent multi day moves up.˜ I thought 1393 would be the price level and the index is a few points short of that price.˜ If the index can close below 1370 it will go a long way to indicate the exhaustion is complete.˜ Moves against an exhaustion style of trend almost never exceed 3 days and the index is down one day.˜

Personally I believe this trend may have exhausted or is within a few days of that completion but no real evidence yet just a probability.˜ Nobody should look to sell or short a high momentum trend without at least a lower high present.

˜

NOW LET?S LOOK AT THE DAX INDEX

˜

˜

This is a classic blowoff or exhaustion style of trend.˜ Three ascending trendlines are the indication of an exhaustion trend.˜ Once a market gets into that third ascending trendline or the fastest and terminal part of the trend the counter trend moves down almost never exceed 3 days down and price does not pull back into the previous resistance until the trend is complete. So there are two benchmarks to indicate when this trend is complete.˜ When this trend exhausts (which it could have done) it will be followed by a sideways pattern that will have the low between 250 and 300 points down from the high.˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜

˜

CNBC ASIA

˜

Last week I indicated most world stock indexes were in the exhaustion phase of their advances and have one multi-day move up to complete their trends.˜ I indicated that exhaustion of their trends would be followed by a correction but that correction would be part of a sideways pattern and not a complete change in trend.˜ I reminded everyone this is currently the fastest part of those trends.

˜

LET?S LOOK AT THE HANG SENG INDEX

˜

˜

This has been a very interesting and instructive trend.˜ We have looked at how the index broke away from the congestion.˜ When the index went 90-calendar days low to low it set up three dates into the future that could terminate the trend or at least represent some difficult resistance.˜ The first was 135 days from low on the 26th then Nov 4th and very important 180 days from low on Dec 10.˜ You can see the exhaustion that occurred on the 26th with a big gap up and closed on the high yet couldn?t follow through the next day.˜ Whether that was a temporary exhaustion of the trend or something more significant I can?t yet say.˜ A drop below 18,100 would be the first indication this could be a significant exhaustion.˜ But for now that is support.

˜

LET?S LOOK AT MY AUGUST FORECAST FOR THE TOPIX

˜

˜

As you can see my forecast has been spot on for the index and is now at a critical point on the chart.˜ Since September 12th was not part of the vibration in ?time? for this index there was another cycle we?ll look at ?time? in a minute.˜ But now that the index has made it to a marginal new high the question is; will it come back into the pattern as my forecast showed?˜

˜

LET?S LOOK AT THE CURRENT DAILY CHART

˜

˜

The vibration in ?time? has been 67 calendar days and half the cycle has been spot on which confirms its validity.˜ Please understand resistance in ?time? is just like resistant in ?price? if it can be broken it can produce a fast trend just as some of the European stock indexes resolved this weak pattern of up trend to the upside a few months ago.˜ Whenever there is a weak trending structure with three drives, as this has been, there is always a risk of a fast move in the opposite direction when the last rally is complete.˜ I don?t believe that is the circumstance here and any correction should hold the September lows in the worst-case scenario.˜ But this is now in a critical position where it will either start a fast move up or follow my forecast and show us some downside testing.˜ The NIKKEI showed a big gap down and wide range day on Friday and could need to consolidate that move with a rally or inside day today.˜ But it did leave an ?island? and could indicate an important exhaustion to its trend.˜ This is a very important week for this index.˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜

˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜

˜


Disclaimer: All the reports and content in the entire McLaren Report web site (including this report) are for educational purposes only and do not constitute trading advice nor an invitation to buy or sell securities. The views are the personal views of the author. Before acting on any of the ideas expressed, the reader should seek professional advice to determine the suitability in view of his or her personal circumstances.

How would you rate the quality of this article?
1 2 3 4 5
Poor Excellent
Verification:
Enter the security code shown below:
img


Article Series
This article is part 8 of a 107 part series. Other articles in this series are shown below:
  1. December 18 2006 CNBC Report
  2. December 11 2006 CNBC Report
  3. December 04 2006 CNBC Report
  4. November 27 2006 CNBC Report
  5. November 20 2006 CNBC Report
  6. November 13 2006 CNBC Report
  7. November 06 2006 CNBC Report
  8. October 30 2006 CNBC Report
  9. October 23 2006 CNBC Report
  10. October 16 2006 CNBC Report
  11. October 09 2006 CNBC REPORT
  12. October 02 2006 CNBC REPORT
  13. September 25 2006 CNBC Report
  14. September 18 2006 CNBC Report
  15. September 11 2006 CNBC Report
  16. September 04 2006 CNBC Report
  17. August 28 2006 CNBC Report
  18. August 14 2006 CNBC Report
  19. August 07 2006 CNBC Report
  20. July 31 2006 CNBC Report
  21. July 24 CNBC Report
  22. July 17 2006 CNBC Report
  23. July 10 2006 CNBC Report
  24. June 26 2006 CNBC Report
  25. June 19 2006 CNBC Report
  26. June 12 2006 CNBC Report
  27. June 05 2006 CNBC Report
  28. May 29 2006 CNBC REPORT
  29. May 22 2006 CNBC Report
  30. May 15 2006 CNBC Report
  31. May 08 2006 CNBC Report
  32. May 02 2006 CNBC Report
  33. April 24 2006 CNBC Report
  34. April 18 2006 CNBC Report Europe
  35. April 17 2006 CNBC Report Asia
  36. April 10 2006 CNBC Report
  37. April 03 2006 CNBC Report
  38. March 27 2006 CNBC Report
  39. March 20 2006 CNBC Report
  40. March 13 2006 CNBC Report
  41. March 06 2006 CNBC Report
  42. Feb 27 2006 CNBC Report
  43. Feb 20 2006 CNBC Report
  44. Feb 13 2006 CNBC Report
  45. Feb 06 2006 CNBC Report
  46. Feb 01 2006 CNBC ASIA
  47. Jan 30 2006 CNBC Report
  48. Jan 23 2006 CNBC Report
  49. Jan 16 2006 CNBC REPORT
  50. Jan 09 2006 CNBC Report
  51. Jan 02 2006 CNBC REPORT
  52. Dec 12 2005 CNBC REPORT
  53. Dec 05 2005 CNBC Report
  54. Nov 28 2005 CNBC Report
  55. Nov 21 2005 CNBC Report
  56. Nov 14 2005 CNBC Report
  57. Nov 07 2005 CNBC Report
  58. Oct 31 2005 CNBC REPORT
  59. Oct 24 2005 CNBC REPORT
  60. Oct 17 2005 CNBC Report
  61. Oct 10 2005 CNBC Report
  62. Oct 03 2005 CNBC Report
  63. Sept 26 2005 CNBC REPORT
  64. Sept 19 2005 CNBC Report
  65. Sept 12 2005 CNBC Report
  66. Sept 05 2005 CNBC Report
  67. August 29 2005 CNBC Report
  68. August 22 2005 CNBC Report
  69. August 15 2005 CNBC Report
  70. August 08 2005 CNBC Report
  71. 08-01-2005 CNBC REPORT
  72. July 25 2005 CNBC REPORT
  73. July 18 2005 CNBC REPORT
  74. July 11 2005 CNBC Report
  75. July 04 2005 CNBC Report
  76. June 27 2005 CNBC Report
  77. June 20 2005 CNBC Report
  78. June 13 2005 CNBC Report
  79. June 06 2005 CNBC Report
  80. May 30 2005 CNBC Report
  81. May 23 2005 CNBC Reports
  82. May 16 2005 CNBC Reports
  83. May 09 2005 CNBC REPORT
  84. May 02 2005 CNBC Report
  85. April 25 2005 CNBC Report
  86. April 18 2005 CNBC Report
  87. April 11 2005 CNBC Report
  88. April 04 2004 CNBC Report
  89. March 29 2005 CNBC Report
  90. March 28 2005 CNBC Report
  91. March 21 2005 CNBC Report
  92. March 14 2005 CNBC REPORT
  93. March 07 2005 CNBC Report
  94. February 21 2005 CNBC Report
  95. February 14 2005 CNBC Report
  96. February 07 2005 CNBC Report
  97. January 31 2005 CNBC REPORT
  98. January 17 2005 CNBC REPORT
  99. January 10 2005 CNBC Report
  100. January 03 2005 CNBC REPORT
  101. DEC 20 2004 CNBC REPORT
  102. Dec 13 2004 CNBC Report
  103. Dec 06 2004 CNBC Reports
  104. Nov 29 2004 CNBC Report
  105. Nov 22 2004 CNBC Report
  106. Nov 15 2004 CNBC Report
  107. Nov 1 2004 CNBC Report