Member Market Reports

Free CNBC Reports
Search


Advanced Search
Article Options
 »  Home  »  Free CNBC Reports 2006  »  February 2006  »  Feb 27 2006 CNBC Report


Feb 27 2006 CNBC Report
By Bill McLaren | Published  12/20/2004 | February 2006 | Unrated
Feb 27 2006 CNBC Report

mclarenreport.com.au

CNBC EUROPE

˜

LET?S LOOK AT THE FTSE 100 INDEX

˜

˜

I?ve been using the same chart the past three weeks.˜ The index continues to struggle against the resistance of an overhead trendline.˜ Last week was a very small range week and after a number of weeks up the small range is indicating supply and demand are about equal. I dislike triangles as a form of technical analysis as most end up as horizontal patterns anyway and just add to the normal confusion.˜ But there is one triangle that was pointed out in Elliott?s work that he referred to as a diagonal triangle and can be qualified because it only shows up in 5th waves of advance and can indicate a termination of the advance.˜ This is a 5th wave and that pattern could be building on the chart and if so will be completed by this week.˜ Last week I said it would go to 5860 and it hit 5869. If it can move higher the target is 5975, but I still have doubts that can occur.˜˜˜

˜

˜

LET?S LOOK AT THE S&P DAILY CHART

˜

˜

As far as I?m concerned this is one of the most important weeks of the year.˜ My forecast calls for the low on the 10th to have started the final exhaustion move up to complete this bull campaign.˜ The only thing that could get in the way of that forecast was the 45- calendar day vibration we looked at last week.˜ I indicated the only way that would concern me is if the index went up into that date and was showing a possible little distribution pattern.˜ There are now 4 days ?on the side? going into the time window and that does give some credibility to this resistance in ?time.?˜ We can view this resistance in ?time? just as we view resistance in ?price,? which the index is also up against at the old high. I can see one of three things happening here.˜ The index blasts through this resistance in ?price and time? and runs for 60 or 90 more days into the final top to this trend or there is a first-degree counter trend down of 1 to 4 trading days from this resistance and the trend resumes as per the 2006 forecast.˜ Or the entire move since the end of November has been distribution and the trend is complete and the index will now trend down.˜ Please understand there is nothing from the pattern of trend to indicate the up trend is complete, just the probability from ?TIME.?˜ And that is only a probability.˜ If it can move up past Tuesday then it is off and running again and my concern will be ?much ado about nothing.?˜ But for now there some risk from this probability in time.˜ There needed to be a lower high, significantly lower high, to set up a mini crash or fast move down and that has not occurred.˜˜

˜

Gold only corrected between 1/3rd and 3/8th of the range up so it could be resuming the trend.

˜

Crude Oil appears to have capitulated into the last low and that usually indicates some consolidation action or range trading for the next month.˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜

˜

CNBC ASIA

˜

LET?S START WITH THE ALL ORDINARIES AUSTRALIAN STOCK INDEX

˜

˜

Last week I indicated this was a very important point within this uptrend.˜ The low of 16th February needed to be THE low or there was a real problem with the trend.˜ I said 80% of the time this configuration brings in a solid low so all it needed was an up day to help confirm the low.˜ Remember, the last high was a complete leg up and this low needs to start another leg up or the bull campaign could be in trouble.˜ So this rally needs to conform to the criteria of a fast trend up and therefore a correction should not exceed 4 days and I could put that at three days being this close to the low.˜ Since this is an exhaustive style of trend and problem that shows up while trending can be important.˜

˜

˜

LET?S TAKE A LOOK AT THE HANG SENG WEEKLY CHART

˜

˜

Last week I indicated the Hang Seng had found a low and was starting the last drive up to this leg of advance. The price objective was between 16100 and 16200.˜ Markets go into tops in two ways.˜ They either exhaust into highs with fast moves. This gets all the buyers into the market so when it does start to correct down there is no one left to support the market.˜ Or markets will struggle into tops, as this index appears to be doing. You can see the first leg was 300 days and almost 6000 points.˜ The next leg was less at 225 days and almost 4000 points and the next leg was 170 days and 2300 points.˜ This current leg is now 120 days and 1720 points, significantly weaker than any of the previous legs up.˜ It would be NORMAL for this index to go to 16100 to 16200 for a top.˜

On occasion this type of struggling trend can develop into an exhaustion mode of trend but that would be abnormal and I didn?t last over 40 years in this business looking for the ABNORMAL to occur.˜ IF the abnormal does occur it will be easy to see developing.˜

˜

LET?S TAKE A QUICK LOOK AT THE GOLD DAILY CHART

˜

˜

This is the June Contract with the last range of movement divided into 1/8th and 1/3rd. The correction was between 1/3rd and 3/8th of the range up and that is the normal correction or counter trend to hold the trend intact for the next drive up, not only in Gold but almost all markets.˜ The December Contract corrected less and is therefore in a stronger position.˜ The move down was 9 trading days.˜ If it is not at a new high or testing the high within 9 trading days of rally we?ll take another look and see if there is a problem with the trend.˜ The next high should be a proportional extension of this range up since ?all highs and lows are exact proportions of previous ranges.?˜˜ So we?ll see if it can test the old high this week and next week I should have a new forecast available.˜˜˜˜

˜˜


Disclaimer: All the reports and content in the entire McLaren Report web site (including this report) are for educational purposes only and do not constitute trading advice nor an invitation to buy or sell securities. The views are the personal views of the author. Before acting on any of the ideas expressed, the reader should seek professional advice to determine the suitability in view of his or her personal circumstances.

How would you rate the quality of this article?
1 2 3 4 5
Poor Excellent
Verification:
Enter the security code shown below:
img


Article Series
This article is part 42 of a 107 part series. Other articles in this series are shown below:
  1. December 18 2006 CNBC Report
  2. December 11 2006 CNBC Report
  3. December 04 2006 CNBC Report
  4. November 27 2006 CNBC Report
  5. November 20 2006 CNBC Report
  6. November 13 2006 CNBC Report
  7. November 06 2006 CNBC Report
  8. October 30 2006 CNBC Report
  9. October 23 2006 CNBC Report
  10. October 16 2006 CNBC Report
  11. October 09 2006 CNBC REPORT
  12. October 02 2006 CNBC REPORT
  13. September 25 2006 CNBC Report
  14. September 18 2006 CNBC Report
  15. September 11 2006 CNBC Report
  16. September 04 2006 CNBC Report
  17. August 28 2006 CNBC Report
  18. August 14 2006 CNBC Report
  19. August 07 2006 CNBC Report
  20. July 31 2006 CNBC Report
  21. July 24 CNBC Report
  22. July 17 2006 CNBC Report
  23. July 10 2006 CNBC Report
  24. June 26 2006 CNBC Report
  25. June 19 2006 CNBC Report
  26. June 12 2006 CNBC Report
  27. June 05 2006 CNBC Report
  28. May 29 2006 CNBC REPORT
  29. May 22 2006 CNBC Report
  30. May 15 2006 CNBC Report
  31. May 08 2006 CNBC Report
  32. May 02 2006 CNBC Report
  33. April 24 2006 CNBC Report
  34. April 18 2006 CNBC Report Europe
  35. April 17 2006 CNBC Report Asia
  36. April 10 2006 CNBC Report
  37. April 03 2006 CNBC Report
  38. March 27 2006 CNBC Report
  39. March 20 2006 CNBC Report
  40. March 13 2006 CNBC Report
  41. March 06 2006 CNBC Report
  42. Feb 27 2006 CNBC Report
  43. Feb 20 2006 CNBC Report
  44. Feb 13 2006 CNBC Report
  45. Feb 06 2006 CNBC Report
  46. Feb 01 2006 CNBC ASIA
  47. Jan 30 2006 CNBC Report
  48. Jan 23 2006 CNBC Report
  49. Jan 16 2006 CNBC REPORT
  50. Jan 09 2006 CNBC Report
  51. Jan 02 2006 CNBC REPORT
  52. Dec 12 2005 CNBC REPORT
  53. Dec 05 2005 CNBC Report
  54. Nov 28 2005 CNBC Report
  55. Nov 21 2005 CNBC Report
  56. Nov 14 2005 CNBC Report
  57. Nov 07 2005 CNBC Report
  58. Oct 31 2005 CNBC REPORT
  59. Oct 24 2005 CNBC REPORT
  60. Oct 17 2005 CNBC Report
  61. Oct 10 2005 CNBC Report
  62. Oct 03 2005 CNBC Report
  63. Sept 26 2005 CNBC REPORT
  64. Sept 19 2005 CNBC Report
  65. Sept 12 2005 CNBC Report
  66. Sept 05 2005 CNBC Report
  67. August 29 2005 CNBC Report
  68. August 22 2005 CNBC Report
  69. August 15 2005 CNBC Report
  70. August 08 2005 CNBC Report
  71. 08-01-2005 CNBC REPORT
  72. July 25 2005 CNBC REPORT
  73. July 18 2005 CNBC REPORT
  74. July 11 2005 CNBC Report
  75. July 04 2005 CNBC Report
  76. June 27 2005 CNBC Report
  77. June 20 2005 CNBC Report
  78. June 13 2005 CNBC Report
  79. June 06 2005 CNBC Report
  80. May 30 2005 CNBC Report
  81. May 23 2005 CNBC Reports
  82. May 16 2005 CNBC Reports
  83. May 09 2005 CNBC REPORT
  84. May 02 2005 CNBC Report
  85. April 25 2005 CNBC Report
  86. April 18 2005 CNBC Report
  87. April 11 2005 CNBC Report
  88. April 04 2004 CNBC Report
  89. March 29 2005 CNBC Report
  90. March 28 2005 CNBC Report
  91. March 21 2005 CNBC Report
  92. March 14 2005 CNBC REPORT
  93. March 07 2005 CNBC Report
  94. February 21 2005 CNBC Report
  95. February 14 2005 CNBC Report
  96. February 07 2005 CNBC Report
  97. January 31 2005 CNBC REPORT
  98. January 17 2005 CNBC REPORT
  99. January 10 2005 CNBC Report
  100. January 03 2005 CNBC REPORT
  101. DEC 20 2004 CNBC REPORT
  102. Dec 13 2004 CNBC Report
  103. Dec 06 2004 CNBC Reports
  104. Nov 29 2004 CNBC Report
  105. Nov 22 2004 CNBC Report
  106. Nov 15 2004 CNBC Report
  107. Nov 1 2004 CNBC Report