Member Market Reports

Free CNBC Reports
Search


Advanced Search
Article Options
 »  Home  »  Free CNBC Reports 2006  »  September 2006  »  September 11 2006 CNBC Report


September 11 2006 CNBC Report
By Bill McLaren | Published  12/20/2004 | September 2006 | Unrated
September 11 2006 CNBC Report

 

CNBC EUROPE

 

LET?S START WITH THE FTSE 100 INDEX-DAILY CHART

 

Our strategy has been to assume this rally would go at least 90 days from the June low.  Tuesday is the 90th day so any indication of a top after that date should be taken seriously.  As I previously explained this is a weak trend up.  The weakness of this trend is obvious as each new high is immediately reversed. The index has been unable to advance from a new swing high.  There are now three marginal new highs, which was necessary to complete the pattern.  Because the first 90-day period has expired and there are three marginal new swing highs we can look for evidence of a top in place or a resolution to this pattern of trend to the upside.  Notice the April top was followed by a lower high that consisted of a 4-day rally and within 2-days the index was at a new low.  You can see the last 30 days of rally into the April high was weak and is simply a smaller version of this current ?pattern of trend.?  This will be resolved in one of two ways.  Either a lower high similar to May of this year or price will move above the last high, come back one to four days and rest on top of that high and resume the uptrend.  The index now has 4 days to move to a new swing high or a lower high is the probability and that appears quite possible.  There are some turning points in ?time? that could prove to be very significant.  If September 17th is a vibration in time then that will lock in September 29, October 17 and a completion of a move in force on November 4th.  

 

LET?S LOOK AT THE S&P 500 DAILY CHART

 

We have been studying the difference between the ?pattern of trend? in the FTSE and the S&P.  Now for the first time since the July low the S&P has pulled back below a previous high, an indication of weakness.  Unlike the FTSE were every new high was immediately reversed.  We had 1313 as the next resistance and the high 1314. This is now the same circumstances as most stock indexes. The index has 4 days to test that last high or there could be a lower high in place and a reversal in trend.  

 

LET?S LOOK AT THE NASDAQ COMP DAILY CHART

 

There has been a 45-calendar day vibration since the high and the next time window is October 17th at 180 days from high and should be significant.  My forecast called for this index to test the ?low before the final high.?  This is the same point of resistance that has stopped many indexes recently, including the FTSE.  If it can hit that higher level the index will correct and not go through it on the first hit.  As with the other indexes we can look for a lower high or a possibly marginal new high up to the next ?LBH.?  

 

  

CNBC ASIA

 

LET?S LOOK AT THE TOPIX DAILY CHART

 

A few weeks ago I laid out the vibrations in ?TIME? for remainder of the year based upon the one-year cycle.  The last timing date was 240 days on September 6th and that was the last high.  The next vibration in that series is October 7th.  You can see the high left a 3-day island or the fact that the high was an exhaustion of some sort could have ended the rally.  This could indicate the last low (double bottom in uptrend) may not hold.  My forecast called for the July high to be broken and a third thrust up to follow this break. 

 

LAST WEEK WE LOOKED AT COPPER-LET?S LOOK AT THE DAILY COPPER CHART AGAIN as it has reached a critical point within the sideways pattern.

 

Last week a rally was obvious due to the struggling nature of the short term down trend.  I indicated the rally was likely to test a previous high and if this were to develop into a bullish move up, the rally needed to exceed 4 days.  The fourth day up was the high and the high was also a bit of an exhaustion due to the ?3 day island? that has been left behind.  In most instances a market will only show three tests of a support or resistance with a high probability the 4th test will go through.  So logically the third test is the dangerous one and can fail and change the trend.  There are only two tests of the low as the last low was all part of the same move down but this is clearly the third test of resistance.  Seeing an exhaustion pattern at the resistance could be an indication of a failure. 

 

LET?S LOOK AT THE ALL ORDINARIES AUSTRALIAN INDEX

 

The All Ords is also at a third test of resistance.  This low started off with a very bullish pattern showing a higher low that developed through July and August.  In fact the higher low turned into a base pattern that took 4 weeks to form, an unusually long time.  The market move up out of the base but the first correction fell back into the base and was a sign of weakness for the trend.  The next rally moved up to test resistance and has fallen below the previous swing high another indication the trend is not strong.  The index needs to move to a new high within the next 4 days or a lower high could be in place and would indicate a test of the 4800 level.  Let me put this another way.  The pattern through August was very bullish but the move up out of that pattern has not been a strong as it should have been considering the size of the higher low and base pattern.  So now we look for a lower high to develop this week and 4 days of rally without a test of the high could set up that lower high.  Or if it can break away above the last high and show a counter trend low on top of that price it would indicate a new high for the bull campaign. Today the index has tested Friday?s low and is a further sign of the weakness of the trend. The metals (as copper) will have an effect on this index and the metals look lower.              

 

 

 

 

 


Disclaimer: All the reports and content in the entire McLaren Report web site (including this report) are for educational purposes only and do not constitute trading advice nor an invitation to buy or sell securities. The views are the personal views of the author. Before acting on any of the ideas expressed, the reader should seek professional advice to determine the suitability in view of his or her personal circumstances.

How would you rate the quality of this article?
1 2 3 4 5
Poor Excellent
Verification:
Enter the security code shown below:
img


Article Series
This article is part 15 of a 107 part series. Other articles in this series are shown below:
  1. December 18 2006 CNBC Report
  2. December 11 2006 CNBC Report
  3. December 04 2006 CNBC Report
  4. November 27 2006 CNBC Report
  5. November 20 2006 CNBC Report
  6. November 13 2006 CNBC Report
  7. November 06 2006 CNBC Report
  8. October 30 2006 CNBC Report
  9. October 23 2006 CNBC Report
  10. October 16 2006 CNBC Report
  11. October 09 2006 CNBC REPORT
  12. October 02 2006 CNBC REPORT
  13. September 25 2006 CNBC Report
  14. September 18 2006 CNBC Report
  15. September 11 2006 CNBC Report
  16. September 04 2006 CNBC Report
  17. August 28 2006 CNBC Report
  18. August 14 2006 CNBC Report
  19. August 07 2006 CNBC Report
  20. July 31 2006 CNBC Report
  21. July 24 CNBC Report
  22. July 17 2006 CNBC Report
  23. July 10 2006 CNBC Report
  24. June 26 2006 CNBC Report
  25. June 19 2006 CNBC Report
  26. June 12 2006 CNBC Report
  27. June 05 2006 CNBC Report
  28. May 29 2006 CNBC REPORT
  29. May 22 2006 CNBC Report
  30. May 15 2006 CNBC Report
  31. May 08 2006 CNBC Report
  32. May 02 2006 CNBC Report
  33. April 24 2006 CNBC Report
  34. April 18 2006 CNBC Report Europe
  35. April 17 2006 CNBC Report Asia
  36. April 10 2006 CNBC Report
  37. April 03 2006 CNBC Report
  38. March 27 2006 CNBC Report
  39. March 20 2006 CNBC Report
  40. March 13 2006 CNBC Report
  41. March 06 2006 CNBC Report
  42. Feb 27 2006 CNBC Report
  43. Feb 20 2006 CNBC Report
  44. Feb 13 2006 CNBC Report
  45. Feb 06 2006 CNBC Report
  46. Feb 01 2006 CNBC ASIA
  47. Jan 30 2006 CNBC Report
  48. Jan 23 2006 CNBC Report
  49. Jan 16 2006 CNBC REPORT
  50. Jan 09 2006 CNBC Report
  51. Jan 02 2006 CNBC REPORT
  52. Dec 12 2005 CNBC REPORT
  53. Dec 05 2005 CNBC Report
  54. Nov 28 2005 CNBC Report
  55. Nov 21 2005 CNBC Report
  56. Nov 14 2005 CNBC Report
  57. Nov 07 2005 CNBC Report
  58. Oct 31 2005 CNBC REPORT
  59. Oct 24 2005 CNBC REPORT
  60. Oct 17 2005 CNBC Report
  61. Oct 10 2005 CNBC Report
  62. Oct 03 2005 CNBC Report
  63. Sept 26 2005 CNBC REPORT
  64. Sept 19 2005 CNBC Report
  65. Sept 12 2005 CNBC Report
  66. Sept 05 2005 CNBC Report
  67. August 29 2005 CNBC Report
  68. August 22 2005 CNBC Report
  69. August 15 2005 CNBC Report
  70. August 08 2005 CNBC Report
  71. 08-01-2005 CNBC REPORT
  72. July 25 2005 CNBC REPORT
  73. July 18 2005 CNBC REPORT
  74. July 11 2005 CNBC Report
  75. July 04 2005 CNBC Report
  76. June 27 2005 CNBC Report
  77. June 20 2005 CNBC Report
  78. June 13 2005 CNBC Report
  79. June 06 2005 CNBC Report
  80. May 30 2005 CNBC Report
  81. May 23 2005 CNBC Reports
  82. May 16 2005 CNBC Reports
  83. May 09 2005 CNBC REPORT
  84. May 02 2005 CNBC Report
  85. April 25 2005 CNBC Report
  86. April 18 2005 CNBC Report
  87. April 11 2005 CNBC Report
  88. April 04 2004 CNBC Report
  89. March 29 2005 CNBC Report
  90. March 28 2005 CNBC Report
  91. March 21 2005 CNBC Report
  92. March 14 2005 CNBC REPORT
  93. March 07 2005 CNBC Report
  94. February 21 2005 CNBC Report
  95. February 14 2005 CNBC Report
  96. February 07 2005 CNBC Report
  97. January 31 2005 CNBC REPORT
  98. January 17 2005 CNBC REPORT
  99. January 10 2005 CNBC Report
  100. January 03 2005 CNBC REPORT
  101. DEC 20 2004 CNBC REPORT
  102. Dec 13 2004 CNBC Report
  103. Dec 06 2004 CNBC Reports
  104. Nov 29 2004 CNBC Report
  105. Nov 22 2004 CNBC Report
  106. Nov 15 2004 CNBC Report
  107. Nov 1 2004 CNBC Report