Member Market Reports

Free CNBC Reports
Search


Advanced Search
Article Options
 »  Home  »  Free CNBC Reports 2006  »  October 2006  »  October 02 2006 CNBC REPORT


October 02 2006 CNBC REPORT
By Bill McLaren | Published  12/20/2004 | October 2006 | Unrated
October 02 2006 CNBC REPORT

CNBC EUROPE

LET?S LOOK AT THE FTSE DAILY CHART

Last week I forecast the index would go to the July low. The index moved down to the August low, which was also the 50% mark of the chart I showed you last week and came screaming back. Remember how we?ve been looking at the trend up and qualifying it as a weak trend up because each time in broke to a new high it immediately turned back with vigor. This move down has now shown the same characteristics of a weak or ?creeping? trend, only this time it has been down and on a smaller scale. One thing that is very important about weak trends is they are always followed by fast trends in the opposite direction----if they are a weak trend. If the movement following the weak trend is not fast, then something else, besides a weak trend, is going on. The weak movement could be a slow accumulation.

So when there was no follow through to the downside on Tuesday and the low on the 19th was recovered, it indicated a weak trend down. Remember it is the three thrusts that set up this pattern of trend. And since there was a weak trend up followed by another weak trend down. Something abnormal was occurring and could indicate the weak trend up was accumulation. The weak trend down has been followed by a fast trend up so that appears to be the valid short-term direction.

The index is now up to the ?obvious? resistance but is coming from a higher double bottom. It should only show a first degree counter trend or it should not correct more than two or three days if it is going higher. Just as the S&P had done at the ?obvious.? Best timing I have is October 21, 27 and 29.

LET?S LOOK AT THE S&P 500 INDEX

The index came up to the ?obvious? resistance fell only two days and within one day was back at the highs and has tested the forecast level of 1340. The next significant level of resistance above 1346 is 1360. There appears to be three days of congestion after the breakout move. IF there are a few more days of marginal higher highs and higher lows and little downside testing the index could show an exhaust move up into the end of October. If there is some downside testing from this congestion the index could get choppy and give us a pattern similar to the end of 1993 style of movement. Although, if the index does repeat that 1993 end of year congestion, it will likely sap what is left of my sanity. I don?t believe time runs out on this drive until Mid-October at the earliest and the bullish consensus is not quite high enough yet to look for a significant top but consensus could be at that level by the middle to end of this month. Any downside test or test of the 1327 level would be normal but will also put the up trend in doubt and leave a much larger congestion or ?false break? as the probability. This week should tell us if this is an exhaustive and vertical style of trend, remember that is how bull campaigns end. If we don?t see a continuation pattern then there could be a problem at this level.

CNBC ASIA

LET?S LOOK AT THE ALL ORDINARIES AUSTRALIAN STOCK INDEX

Last week I said would tell the story for this index. There were a large number of higher lows in the sideways pattern but the index had just done a 4-day rally that failed and could be trending down. I indicated if it couldn?t take out the low the first two days of the week it wasn?t going to do it. Monday and Tuesday were small range days and couldn?t break the low so Wednesday was up and it is now testing the significant (obvious) resistance. If ?they? couldn?t break the index last week, why would ?they? be able to this week? This is the third attempt at the ?obvious? resistance if this is going to test the all time highs there should only be a small multi day congestion or a counter trend of one or two days. This needs to continue with a strong move and if this is a trend coming out of a base it will not correct back for than four maybe even three days at anytime until this trend is complete.

LET?S LOOK AT THE HANG SENG

Last report I did on this index was the first week in August and I said the objective was 17.8 to 17.9 and September 11 was the key date. September 11 was the last low and it drove up to 17.78 or very close to our objective. The next date in the time series is for high on the 26th or 27th of October. You can see the index has been in a congestion phase the past three months as each new high has resulted in a significant downside test. This is also approaching the price of the March 2000 top so some congestion could be anticipated. Here?s the deal. This is normally a bearish pattern coming at the end of a fast trend as it normally represents distribution. If that is not the case and this is a bullish congestion this range will represent between ® to 2/3rd of the leg up. The first move down within this pattern was 6-days, the second move down was 5 days and currently the index is down 4 days and still close to the high. If this is going to spike up out of this pattern it needs to do it this week and early this week. I have identified a similar circumstance on the first part of the chart in March. If it is going to break out to the upside it needs to do it now as it did back in March. If not then there will be a fast test of the September low and quite possibly lower.

I see no reason to change the forecast for the Topix-it should see a marginal move above the September high. This weekend has some timing and well look at this market next Monday and determine the significance of those cycles if any.

It is as though every world stock index is at resistance all at the same time, interesting.


Disclaimer: All the reports and content in the entire McLaren Report web site (including this report) are for educational purposes only and do not constitute trading advice nor an invitation to buy or sell securities. The views are the personal views of the author. Before acting on any of the ideas expressed, the reader should seek professional advice to determine the suitability in view of his or her personal circumstances.

How would you rate the quality of this article?
1 2 3 4 5
Poor Excellent
Verification:
Enter the security code shown below:
img


Article Series
This article is part 12 of a 107 part series. Other articles in this series are shown below:
  1. December 18 2006 CNBC Report
  2. December 11 2006 CNBC Report
  3. December 04 2006 CNBC Report
  4. November 27 2006 CNBC Report
  5. November 20 2006 CNBC Report
  6. November 13 2006 CNBC Report
  7. November 06 2006 CNBC Report
  8. October 30 2006 CNBC Report
  9. October 23 2006 CNBC Report
  10. October 16 2006 CNBC Report
  11. October 09 2006 CNBC REPORT
  12. October 02 2006 CNBC REPORT
  13. September 25 2006 CNBC Report
  14. September 18 2006 CNBC Report
  15. September 11 2006 CNBC Report
  16. September 04 2006 CNBC Report
  17. August 28 2006 CNBC Report
  18. August 14 2006 CNBC Report
  19. August 07 2006 CNBC Report
  20. July 31 2006 CNBC Report
  21. July 24 CNBC Report
  22. July 17 2006 CNBC Report
  23. July 10 2006 CNBC Report
  24. June 26 2006 CNBC Report
  25. June 19 2006 CNBC Report
  26. June 12 2006 CNBC Report
  27. June 05 2006 CNBC Report
  28. May 29 2006 CNBC REPORT
  29. May 22 2006 CNBC Report
  30. May 15 2006 CNBC Report
  31. May 08 2006 CNBC Report
  32. May 02 2006 CNBC Report
  33. April 24 2006 CNBC Report
  34. April 18 2006 CNBC Report Europe
  35. April 17 2006 CNBC Report Asia
  36. April 10 2006 CNBC Report
  37. April 03 2006 CNBC Report
  38. March 27 2006 CNBC Report
  39. March 20 2006 CNBC Report
  40. March 13 2006 CNBC Report
  41. March 06 2006 CNBC Report
  42. Feb 27 2006 CNBC Report
  43. Feb 20 2006 CNBC Report
  44. Feb 13 2006 CNBC Report
  45. Feb 06 2006 CNBC Report
  46. Feb 01 2006 CNBC ASIA
  47. Jan 30 2006 CNBC Report
  48. Jan 23 2006 CNBC Report
  49. Jan 16 2006 CNBC REPORT
  50. Jan 09 2006 CNBC Report
  51. Jan 02 2006 CNBC REPORT
  52. Dec 12 2005 CNBC REPORT
  53. Dec 05 2005 CNBC Report
  54. Nov 28 2005 CNBC Report
  55. Nov 21 2005 CNBC Report
  56. Nov 14 2005 CNBC Report
  57. Nov 07 2005 CNBC Report
  58. Oct 31 2005 CNBC REPORT
  59. Oct 24 2005 CNBC REPORT
  60. Oct 17 2005 CNBC Report
  61. Oct 10 2005 CNBC Report
  62. Oct 03 2005 CNBC Report
  63. Sept 26 2005 CNBC REPORT
  64. Sept 19 2005 CNBC Report
  65. Sept 12 2005 CNBC Report
  66. Sept 05 2005 CNBC Report
  67. August 29 2005 CNBC Report
  68. August 22 2005 CNBC Report
  69. August 15 2005 CNBC Report
  70. August 08 2005 CNBC Report
  71. 08-01-2005 CNBC REPORT
  72. July 25 2005 CNBC REPORT
  73. July 18 2005 CNBC REPORT
  74. July 11 2005 CNBC Report
  75. July 04 2005 CNBC Report
  76. June 27 2005 CNBC Report
  77. June 20 2005 CNBC Report
  78. June 13 2005 CNBC Report
  79. June 06 2005 CNBC Report
  80. May 30 2005 CNBC Report
  81. May 23 2005 CNBC Reports
  82. May 16 2005 CNBC Reports
  83. May 09 2005 CNBC REPORT
  84. May 02 2005 CNBC Report
  85. April 25 2005 CNBC Report
  86. April 18 2005 CNBC Report
  87. April 11 2005 CNBC Report
  88. April 04 2004 CNBC Report
  89. March 29 2005 CNBC Report
  90. March 28 2005 CNBC Report
  91. March 21 2005 CNBC Report
  92. March 14 2005 CNBC REPORT
  93. March 07 2005 CNBC Report
  94. February 21 2005 CNBC Report
  95. February 14 2005 CNBC Report
  96. February 07 2005 CNBC Report
  97. January 31 2005 CNBC REPORT
  98. January 17 2005 CNBC REPORT
  99. January 10 2005 CNBC Report
  100. January 03 2005 CNBC REPORT
  101. DEC 20 2004 CNBC REPORT
  102. Dec 13 2004 CNBC Report
  103. Dec 06 2004 CNBC Reports
  104. Nov 29 2004 CNBC Report
  105. Nov 22 2004 CNBC Report
  106. Nov 15 2004 CNBC Report
  107. Nov 1 2004 CNBC Report